“CHAPTER 5” DIFFUSION THEORY
نویسندگان
چکیده
In many nuclear reactor physics texts (excluding Elmer Lewis’s recent text however), “Chapter 5” is dedicated to diffusion theory; hence, the title of this submission. Here, we will investigate analytical solutions most basic form monoenergetic 1D stationary equation. The intuitive approach taken radically departs from usual method solving particular, consider a general setting such that accommodates all equations in plane and curvilinear geometries. This not your father’s theory and, for reason, anticipate it eventually become classroom standard.
منابع مشابه
Chapter 5 Field Theory Research Team 5
Our research field is physics of elementary particles and nuclei, which tries to answer questions in history of mankind: What is the smallest component of matter and what is the most fundamental interactions? This research subject is related to the early universe and the nucleosynthesis through Big Bang cosmology. Another important aspect is quantum properties, which play an essential role in t...
متن کاملChapter 5 attachment Theory within a Modern evolutionary framework
as this quotation indicates, Charles Darwin was an attachment theorist. Although he focused on “society” (instead of significant others) and “comrades” (instead of attachment figures), Darwin was the first scientist to appreciate the full extent to which human social nature is a product of selection pressures. John Bowlby, who not only admired Darwin’s theoretical vision but was one of his biog...
متن کاملSummer 2010 Course on Model Theory : Chapter 5
Having seen that categoricity is a concept of somewhat limited usefulness, we now turn to a more versatile (and historically prior) technique for establishing model completeness, namely quantifier elimination. But more than just giving further criteria for showing that theories are model / completen, quantifier elimination is a fundamental concept in its own right (arguably more so than categor...
متن کاملCHAPTER 5 – JOHN WORRALL : Error , Tests and Theory
In this paper I address what seems to be a sharp difference of opinion between myself and Mayo concerning a fundamental problem in the theory of confirmation.1 Not surprisingly, I will argue that I am right and she is (interestingly) wrong. But first I need to outline the background carefully – because seeing clearly what the problem is (and what it is not) takes us a good way towards its corre...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Epj Web of Conferences
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2101-6275', '2100-014X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124714005